|Say No to Facebook|
Facebook has returned the favor: not only are your page updates not reaching all of your fans, but you can now pay to reach all of the people that have "liked" your Facebook page and became your fan. (disclosure: I and many people assumed fan page updates were seen by all fans, but apparently this was not so) They do claim that you were never reaching all of your fans before this update, but some believe otherwise.
Question: Why would you put your Facebook vanity URL onto a highway billboard instead of the URL of your own website?
Just to recap: you encouraged your fans to go to Facebook to follow you. Only a percentage of those that became your fan are actually seeing your updates. And after driving traffic to Facebook, they're now making you pay for the privilege of reaching all of the people that became your fan... And you're never provided with their contact information so you can't contact them directly.
What if, instead of charging relatively small amounts for you to get your updates in the news feed of your fans, they charged you for having a fan page and treated each of your updates as an advertisement that you needed to pay for. Think of all of the time, effort, and money that you wasted, as well as the fan connections that you'll lose, by essentially promoting Facebook as your primary media outlet.
It's time to re-claim your fanbase
Take a deep breath: it's time to stop promoting Facebook. Sure, you still want people to become a Facebook fan, and you still want people to share your site and updates with their friends, but it's time to divert the energy and money that you were dedicating to your Facebook page back to your website. It's time to re-energize your website, the one that has been stagnating while you post lots of fresh content to your Facebook fan page, and re-prioritize the tools that your site uses to get sign ups, provide updates, and send
Rather than diverting them to Facebook and inserting that intermediary between you and your fans, get them to sign up with you so you can contact them directly, all of them, without paying "promotion fees" for the privilege. Instead of putting the Facebook logo on your homepage, almost as large as your own logo, and putting it in a position of prominence, perhaps put it in the sidebar or footer, smaller, not quite as dark blue (perhaps grey?)... and allow your own marketing to have higher authority.
Blogs aren't passe, you've been blogging without knowing it
Social media became the hot topic, replacing blogs, which are often no longer seen as hip. But blogging never went away; when you update your Facebook fan page, tweet on Twitter, use instagram, or any other "social media" service, you are actually blogging (photo-blogging, video-blogging, micro-blogging, etc.).
Bring that effort, and incredible content, back into your site. Put that same great content into your site's blog, or if you don't have blog functionality in your site, add it immediately. Use your website's blog as your content origination point, then use tools such as Ping.fm, RSS Graffiti, FeedBurner and others to distribute your content to the different networks. And if that other network is a content origination tool, make sure that that network is set to point that new content to your blog in addition to it's own network site. You'll still be able to take advantage of the social media benefits of content sharing, but you'll be establishing your property as the originating point, and all roads will lead back to your origination point.
Once you've brought your content back to your site, take a look at your website and other promotional material. Ask yourself: am I promoting myself, or am I promoting these social media sites? Am I capturing fans that I can continually reconnect with, or am I giving someone else (such as Facebook) another revenue source? Do I own my fan relationship or does someone else?
Facebook and other social media sites should be part of your media/dissemination strategy, they should not the crux of your media/dissemination strategy.
And remember, for Google and other search engines, Content is King; Long Live the King.
Seems that some companies are doubting the truth behind advertising on Facebook's platform, while others are doubting the value of "likes".
It also appears that Mark Cuban agrees with my assessment regarding Facebook.
Between November 2013 and January 2014 "social publishers" saw their traffic dip substantially. These sites, sites that based their content marketing strategy almost entirely on Facebook, saw their traffic drop anywhere from 30% to 50%. To get a sense of what that meant for one publisher, Upworthy, that meant their traffic decreased from 14 million unique visitors in November to 7 million in January. Yes, a loss of 7 million visitors. It's probably a safe bet to assume that they're investigating other means of finding visitors and getting them to share content.
Need more convincing? Watch this video.